the answer is yes to the question but the syntax may need to be tweaked.
The scenario laid out indicates an Ethernet connection to the firewall
therefore the priority list list will need to be applied to the interface
itself.
ex. int Ethernet 0
ip address 1.1.1.1. 255.255.255.0
priority-group 1
You can then define the "policy" itself.
ex. priority-list 1 protocol ip low tcp 1111 (where 1111 is the tcp port
#)
priority-list 1 protocol ip medium tcp 1114
You would base this on what the firewall will allow through so you are not
forwarding packets to the firewall that it won't allow through anyway.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernard, Kurt A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 1999 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FTP Issues
Does anyone know if a Cisco 4500 running 11.0 or higher ( or any other
router/linux) prioritize ip packets based on
tcp port number?
I have a 4500 on the other side of my FW and want to lower the priority of
certain traffic before it gets to the FW.
Any help you can lend will be appreciated.
tks, Kurt
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
*****************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
*****************************************************************************
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
