Thanks to everyone for answering my questions ...
A few things:
1. NAV FW can be updated using the normal NT updater on Symantec's
Web site. I ran both the one for 2.0 and the one for 4.0 and 5.0.
Both seemed to indicate failure, but the definitions were updated
anyway.
2. Out of curiosity, how is fault-tolerance handled with FW-1? If the
CVP server is down, what does it do?
3. It seems that NAV for FW hasn't been updated in a while. I'll call
Symantec and find out what their strategy is, but I don't know how
honest an answer I'll get, so if someone here has some info, I'd
love to hear it.
4. About anti-virus products in general -- it seems that people like
Symantec for their ability to respond quickly to new virus
threats. On the other hand, people do not like NAI because it
takes a long time for them to post fixes. People also like
Trend Micro and eSafe. I'm personally leaning away from Norton
because of the following reasons:
5. Norton does not log e-mail scans. For example, if you ask
Norton to strip .exe files, it doesn't log incidences of this
happening. Also, it doesn't copy these files to quarrantine,
which the documentation indicates it should. The stats that
NAV shows are reset every time the service is restarted --
there is now historical information. Also, LiveUpdate can
only be scheduled to update every 3 days at the most, which
is a problem when you have something like WormExplore.Zip
or Melissa, which can spread pretty quickly.
Currently, I'm leaning towards Trend Micro a firewall virus solution.
But I'd like to hear from more people on what they've chosen. I'm fully
aware that this is not a cure all, but every bit counts.
Sorry I didn't specify I wanted something that worked with firewalls,
and not something that worked in conjunction with firewalls. I kind of
figured that running both on the same server would be a mistake.
Thanks!
Jen
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
