I think this happens when someone bcc's the message to the list instead of
sticking the address in the "to" field were it belongs. Just to test my
theory, thats how im sending this message.
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Chuck Milam wrote:
>
>The past few days, I've seen messages that should have apparently gone to
>the list come instead directly to me (see below.) Anyone else see this?
>Is this a case of a broken mailer out there somewhere?
>
>Even stranger, it appears that the messages have gone through the list
>system, since the standard list footer message has been added (again, see
>below):
>
>--
>Chuck Milam - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I.T. Division - Academic Computing
>University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:44:48 +0200
>From: Pieter Grobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Security clasifications??
>
>Hi,
>
>How do you classify information, hardware and software with respect to
>security so that
>it will be simpler to inter grade information, hardware and software.
>An example:
>
>Information : AAA Very sensitive : A1
>Hardware: ABC Not secure: B1
>Hardware: DEF Secure: A1
>software : NT Not secure: B2
>software: UX Secure: A1
>
>Thus Information: AAA can not be used with Hardware: ABC and Software :
>NT
>But
>Can be used with hardware: DEF and Software: UX Because it have the same
>level of
>security classification.
>
>Are there such standards or not ?
>
>Thanks Pieter
>
>-
>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
>-
>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
