Oh wow, has the CyberCop IDS piece been released yet? I was not aware if
it had. Last I checked they were still working on it and all that was
available was the scanner (available in the sense that you getting an
eval copy was impossible so I guess you have to buy before you try).
If however you are talking about the scanner, it bears no relevance to
the thread.
Carric Dooley
COM2:Interactive Media
http://www.com2usa.com
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Mellon, Ty wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Have you looked at CyberCop? CyberCop has beaten ISS hands down
> multiple times in third-party head-to-head testing (More
> Vulnerabilities, etc...)
>
>
> Ty Mellon
> Account Manager - Active Security, Network Associates, Inc.
> * Voice: (800)338-8754x7918 * Fax: (972)855-2664
> * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.nai.com
> http://www.nai.com/activesecurity/
> Gauntlet Firewall - Virtual Private Networks(VPN) - PGP (encryption) -
> CyberCop Scanner (Vulnerability & Risk Assessment) - CyberCop Monitor
> (Real-time Intrusion Detection)
> Who's Watching Your Network?
>
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: SiOL CERT [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 12:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IDS: Net Ranger vs. RealSecure vs. NFR
>
> Hi.
>
> I have two intrusion detection systems on a trial run, but have to
> chose the
> big winner. Both of them have been recommended as the cream of the
> crop and
> 'best money can buy', but from the wrong persons.
>
> One of them is Cisco's Net Ranger Director, which uses HP OpenView as
> a GUI
> (not prefered) and other one is ISS' Real Secure, which is a bit of a
> pain
> because I'd need to set a machine on each segment of the network I
> want to
> monitor.
>
> The third IDS is my personal favorite NFR's Network Flight Recorder
> (ever
> since I read the white paper), but I need more informations about all
> of the
> mentioned IDS systems (especially cons, pros are more or less known).
>
> The network in question is an ISP's public part of the system, which
> means I
> need some detection system than can swallow more than 70Mbit traffic
> on the
> fly.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Saso
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5
>
> iQA/AwUBN4IRlqBda5ixDLy5EQJpIQCgkj+GSqBZcfvfqhtoeEWpPHTq3roAoOa/
> Xg6AdHT5IcvhYgFTqXPMXEZc
> =x2hT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
