Last time I talked to NAI about this (about a month ago) this wasn't out and
wouldn't be for several months (particularly amusing as I had invited them
in to demo it and they didn't tell me this until 3/4 way through!)
Regards,
Ralph Pyne.
---------------------------------------------------
Oh wow, has the CyberCop IDS piece been released yet? I was not aware if
it had. Last I checked they were still working on it and all that was
available was the scanner (available in the sense that you getting an
eval copy was impossible so I guess you have to buy before you try).
If however you are talking about the scanner, it bears no relevance to
the thread.
Carric Dooley
COM2:Interactive Media
http://www.com2usa.com
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Mellon, Ty wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Have you looked at CyberCop? CyberCop has beaten ISS hands down
> multiple times in third-party head-to-head testing (More
> Vulnerabilities, etc...)
>
>
> Ty Mellon
> Account Manager - Active Security, Network Associates, Inc.
> * Voice: (800)338-8754x7918 * Fax: (972)855-2664
> * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.nai.com
> http://www.nai.com/activesecurity/
> Gauntlet Firewall - Virtual Private Networks(VPN) - PGP (encryption) -
> CyberCop Scanner (Vulnerability & Risk Assessment) - CyberCop Monitor
> (Real-time Intrusion Detection)
> Who's Watching Your Network?
>
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: SiOL CERT [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 12:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IDS: Net Ranger vs. RealSecure vs. NFR
>
> Hi.
>
> I have two intrusion detection systems on a trial run, but have to
> chose the
> big winner. Both of them have been recommended as the cream of the
> crop and
> 'best money can buy', but from the wrong persons.
>
> One of them is Cisco's Net Ranger Director, which uses HP OpenView as
> a GUI
> (not prefered) and other one is ISS' Real Secure, which is a bit of a
> pain
> because I'd need to set a machine on each segment of the network I
> want to
> monitor.
>
> The third IDS is my personal favorite NFR's Network Flight Recorder
> (ever
> since I read the white paper), but I need more informations about all
> of the
> mentioned IDS systems (especially cons, pros are more or less known).
>
> The network in question is an ISP's public part of the system, which
> means I
> need some detection system than can swallow more than 70Mbit traffic
> on the
> fly.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Saso
***********************************************************************
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and intended
solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). This information may be
subject to legal professional or other privilege or may otherwise be protected by work
product immunity or other legal rules. It must not be disclosed to any person without
our authority.
If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to
the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy,
distribute, or retain this message or any part of it.
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
