No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------
De: stbrow - Stacy Brown[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada: Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 15:39
Para: 'Randall, Mark'; Dave Gillett
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: trial & charges
Prioridade: Baixa
That something isn't breaking a law doesn't mean its OK to do it. Port
scanning a perfect stranger's machine, when you have no business knowing
what that machine is running, is not something the nice and pure net user
should be doing, precisely because it seeks to get information you really
have no business knowing. If you want to find out if that machine is
running a web server, you check port 80. You don't need to check ports
1-32000 looking for it.
That isn't saying it SHOULD be against the law, because it shouldn't. But
everyone here seems to think it must be one extreme or the other -
perfectly ok or illegal. That's not the case.
I'm done with this thread now, its getting ridiculous.
>
> What law is broken by doing so?
>
> Who says I can run a port scan against *.*.*.* anytime I like?
>
> As far as I'm concerned, this is just another normal and
> proper part of the
> traffic flowing on the net...
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
