Ports 1975 and 1976 are used by the CISCO implementation of Bridging
and IBM Networking (SNA variations)
See document at: (use entire URL that wraps to more than one line)
http://www.pluscom.ru/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgc
r/ibm_c/bcovervw.htm
The documentation at this URL does not refer to ports 1975/1976, but
they are documented elsewhere in the command reference and guide for
Bridging.
Also refer to: (use entire URL that wraps to more than one line)
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12supd
oc/12cmdsum/12csibm/csstun.htm
Search the document for the Port 1976 and 1977 command references.
E. R. Malmstrom
U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: UDP Port 1976
Author: "Newman; Neil (QEK) Walsall ITA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
at Internet
Date: 9/24/1999 4:38 PM
sorry to disagree gozilla gets its adverts on port 1975 (tcp) not 1976 (udp)
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Gillett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 September 1999 19:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UDP Port 1976
On 8 Sep 99, at 10:06, Liutger Franzen wrote:
> > > Somebody's been sending me UDP packets from, and to, port 1976.
Anybody
> > > recognize this?
> >
> > Te list of iana assigned ports at:
> > http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers
> > says :
> >
> > tcoregagent 1976/udp TCO Reg Agent
>
> it is go!zilla - the application gets its banners that way
Thanks.
> > http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers
This list is apparently more up-to-date than any I've been checking. I
suppose it's too late to suggest that there should be *one* canonical master
list location on the web and a handful of mirror sites, instead of dozens of
old list snapshots in various stages of obsolescent decay....
David G
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
Received: from mimesweeper2.sec.gov (162.138.246.4) by smtpgate.sec.gov with
SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange 2.11 Enterprise) id 000F01CB; Fri, 24 Sep 99 13:01:15
-0500
Received: from secfw2.sec.gov (unverified) by mimesweeper2.sec.gov
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 24 Sep 1999 13:00:46 -0400
Received: by secfw2.sec.gov; id MAA31285; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 12:58:37 -0400
Received: from beasley.paix.gnac.net(209.182.195.70) by secfw2.sec.gov via smap
(/2.1+anti-relay+anti-spam)
id xma031263; Fri, 24 Sep 99 12:58:17 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by beasley.paix.gnac.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA27872
for firewalls-include; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netway.nhs.uk (netway.nhs.uk [195.99.125.205])
by beasley.paix.gnac.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA27832
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 08:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hn-ext by netway.nhs.uk (Sendmail 8.8.8) with esmtp id
11UXJx-0002mR-00; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:31:37 +0100
Received: from hn-int by hn-netway.nhs.uk (Sendmail 8.8.8) with esmtp id
11UXGi-0000b5-00; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:28:16 +0100
Received: by firewall.walsall-ha.wmids.nhs.uk id <32257>; Fri, 24 Sep 1999
16:33:55 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Newman, Neil (QEK) Walsall ITA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Dave Gillett'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UDP Port 1976
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:38:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text/plain
