-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> OK - That being said, what is the difference? I thought a DMZ was a
> screened subnet.
As I understand the term from the O'Reilly & Bellovin firewalls books, a
DMZ is all the systems which are set in the same address space as the
firewall; not hanging off of it from a third NIC. The third NIC subnet
allows for the firewall to afford some protection to these systems,
whereas my definition leaves the DMZ systems unprotected except for there
own methods. See what I mean?
geoffrey
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Two hundred ... forty dollars ...
worth of puddin'! Aaah yeaaah!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Key fingerprint ===> 3B5C 0F9E 4CE0 EEA7 980B 6F43 B342 23C8 EF21 48DF
Public key available upon request.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBOJ0iSbNCI8jvIUjfEQKhYgCdHoIuNelteodAwtRDpfmE2pfzlDYAoK0A
DRHXYF2yrBohTvl3EvxPp170
=Eenk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
