Ops!!! years? only a few days... sorry, I wrong "days for years".
BTW, I wish ("I hope" is to another case) you have a nice day! ... My english had a
few errors.!
Javier Romero wrote:
> Hi Lisa,
>
> Do you know that if possible use a Failover PIX like a normal PIX with license (UR
> or Entry) for a few years while Matias run patchs and test new configurations in
> the non-Failover PIX (the first PIX), in order to hold alive the service (servers
> behind of the PIXes)?
>
> TIA.
>
> I hope that you have a nice day!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > OK, that�s what I wanted to know, if it was just a legal issue or that it won�t
> > work.
> > I will speak with Cisco to have their approve to do it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matias.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/03/2000 10:52:50 a.m.
> >
> > To: Matias Christensen/Argentina/AMERICAS/Equant@Equant
> > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Subject: Re: Using Failover pixes separately
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > What you are suggesting is illegal. The PIX failover bundle is essentially
> > a software license on the second PIX and Cisco make the redundant option
> > attractive by reducing the cost of the hardware. The current situation is
> > that only the live PIX uses the license at any time.
> >
> > Legally you will need to purchase a new license for the second PIX.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
