> I agree wholeheartedly. This is not Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream. This is 
> supposedly the largest security company in the world. They ought to be 
> ashamed of themselves and someone ought to get fired.

This, at least, I can agree with - I was actually trying to point out that the crack 
wasn't actually a sign their software was at fault, which was the original post in 
this thread was implying. I don't suppose we'll ever actually know who made the remote 
hosting decision, but I have a definite suspicion that somewhere, a security bod at 
NAI is saying "I told you so." If there isn't, then whoever it is wasn't doing their 
job.

Perhaps I'm biased, but I've never spoken to a security professional who liked the 
idea of remote hosting. Does anyone on this list feel otherwise?

Mike

----
Michael Owen
IT Security Engineer
NET-TEL Computer Systems Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to