> This is more interesting than a lot of the discussion recently. :-) I'm > intrigued... I cannot figure out what flagged it. Maybe it was in the headers. Let's go back and look... > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:53:28 -0800 > X-Sexually-Discriminating-Level: high > X-Please-Reject-My-Post: yes Ah, there it is! ;-) -- Brian Hatch Monday is an Systems and awful way to Security Engineer spend 1/7th http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ of your life. Every message PGP signed
- fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimination&qu... Jeff . Hodges
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... Frederick M Avolio
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Disc... Brian Hatch
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... Martin
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... Brian Hatch
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... Mark Felps
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... firewalllist
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... Jeff . Hodges
- Re: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... Jeffery . Gieser
- RE: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimi... Shivdasani, Meenoo
PGP signature