Brenno, > Maybe build a firewall cluster with Stonebeat and Firewall -1 if you > run your systems on Solaris or NT (would not recommend NT though). > You can scale your cluster to make a more load balanced / load sharing > firewall solution then just one system firewall That's the option I'm thinking off. However, I'm worried that I might have to put 3 firewalls in there as the bandwith would be too big. The guys that I work with reckon that with our "standard" firewall-1 build, the machines can only handle 60 Mbps... and I'll need to put three of those to achieve 155 Mbps. That's a lot of admin work compared with, as you say, the PIXes. There there's only 1 conf to do, no OS to patch, etc, etc, etc... -- p. _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Hiemstra, Brenno
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Richard Taylor
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation black
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradatio... Jose Nazario
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Carl E. Mankinen
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation icakmakli
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Hiemstra, Brenno
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation icakmakli
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Carl E. Mankinen
