Carl, > I've used FW1 with a ForeRunner PCA200E NIC. It was running at OC-3 > 155Mbps and a couple times I saw the traffic as high as 130Mbps. The > firewall was handling the traffic nicely, but the NIC drivers were > reporting an increasing number of "large buffer failures". Not sure if > that means that FW1 was not handling the packets quickly enough and > the cells were getting dropped or what. This was with NT, right? Mmm... it looks like it's 130 Mbps max then. Interesting. That way if I load balance only two decent machines I'd be all set. Great. Thanks for the info. Regards, -- p. _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Richard Taylor
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation black
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradatio... Jose Nazario
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Carl E. Mankinen
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation icakmakli
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Hiemstra, Brenno
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- RE: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation icakmakli
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Pere Camps
- Re: Checkpoint FW-1 & ATM performance degradation Carl E. Mankinen
