>From experience, the Watchguard may look good on the outside, but the
service and support is miserable. You would be much better suited with a
Netscreen for the comparison.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
�
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-----Original Message-----
From: o28aces [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Watchguard vs. Cisco PIX
My company is looking to purchase a firewall; we are looking at the
Watchguard 4500 and the Cisco PIX 515. Our communication lines that
we use are 3 T1 lines. We have 14 employees in the office and a
development website. When the website goes live it could have 500
concurrent users on it. We would like a firewall that is reliable
and somewhat easy to configure. I have heard the Watchguard is
easier to configure, but Cisco PIX are one of the best firewall, but
a little harder to get up and going. Any suggestions would be gladly
accepted.
Thanks Beldon
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
