It doesn't say that you have to have a CISSP vouch for you. Another "qualified"
person, employer, or "certified" person will have to vouch for you. As to what the
ISC2 deems as "certified" and "qualified" we'll have to wait and see. My biggest bitch
is with the 4 year degree requirement in 2003. Having only a GED, this will definitely
force me to take the exam soon. I know many folks that skip the college route to go
into either the networking or security fields and generally they end up doing quite
allright professionally.
Oh well,
Chris Kirschke
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 5/15/2002 8:14 AM
To: Security Related; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: CISSP
I agree whole heartily. I have a ton of security experience
and I am planning on taking the exam in July. I don't
know any CISSP's at all (even casually). I am the only
security person at my company. How on earth could they
expect a total stranger to vouch for me? Why would not
knowing a CISSP be a reason to disqualify you from
getting certified?
Mike
> That sounds like a bad idea, basically it means that
> if you don't already know a CISSP (of which there are
> not all THAT many), you are in a position of having
> to convince someone who doesn't know you to vouch for
> you. sounds great. Don't get me wrong, I like that
> they want the cert to retain it's value I just don't
> know that I like that method.
>
> ES
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to:
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
*���e�f��)��+-*���e�X���'i�Z+�(�{Ljv�zg���칻 �&ށ�r���Z��(�p�^jǠ��!���X���'i����Y���b�ا~�ߊ��jYl
