This is only one alternative to help them with the verification of experience and education. They will continue to accept applications without sponsorship.
-- Bill Stackpole ----- Original Message ----- From: "Security Related" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:21 AM Subject: RE: CISSP > That sounds like a bad idea, basically it means that > if you don't already know a CISSP (of which there are > not all THAT many), you are in a position of having > to convince someone who doesn't know you to vouch for > you. sounds great. Don't get me wrong, I like that > they want the cert to retain it's value I just don't > know that I like that method. > > ES > --- > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Bill Royds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "John Maestrale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: CISSP > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 23:16:06 -0400 > > It may be of interest the (ISC)2, the CISSP certificate granting body, > intends to ask for an already certified CISPP to vouch for your experience > before granting you the certification. This will probably start as of June 1 > this year. They are really tightening up the certification rules to make it > much more than a memory work exercise. > Bill Royds, CISSP > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Maestrale > Sent: Tue May 14 2002 16:27 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: CISSP > > > Don't bother with the classes they are horrible. Use the study guides from > SRVBOOKS. > > John Maestrale,SSCP > Network Engineer > National Board of Medical Examiners > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Firewalls digest, Vol 1 #763 - 19 msgs > > > Send Firewalls mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Firewalls digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: CISSP (ecklesd) > 2. Re: CISSP (ecklesd) > 3. Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco PIX > firewall? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 4. NT Syslog client ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 5. Re: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco > PIXfirewall? (Mikael Olsson) > 6. RE: NT Syslog client (Clark, Steve) > 7. Re: Firewalls digest, Vol 1 #762 - 8 msgs (Guojia Zhang) > 8. Re: NT Syslog client (Mikael Olsson) > 9. Re: Logging to Ciscoworks (Mikael Olsson) > 10. Re: NT Syslog client (Bret Watson) > 11. Winroute Pro (Vishal Mukherjee) > 12. Re: CISSP ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 13. CheckPoint FireWall-1 (NG) on Nokia's IP 530 throughput question > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 14. CheckPoint FireWall-1 (NG) on Nokia's IP 530 throughput question > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 15. Re: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco > PIXfirewall? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 16. RE: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco > PIXfirewall? (Ben Nagy) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "ecklesd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: CISSP > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 06:33:27 -0400 > > Chris, > > You can get a copy of the Study Guide by going to > http://www.isc2.org/studyguide > > You will need to apply, but it does not cost anything. > > Lance > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:15 PM > Subject: CISSP > > > > I've been reading up on the CISSP. While I don't have the $$$$ to attend > classes, can some of you recommend some books that you have used to obtain > your designation. > > Thanks, > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > Firewalls mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go > to: > > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: "ecklesd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: CISSP > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 06:35:10 -0400 > > Actually checking that again I see that they have changed the process .. > here is the new link: > > https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/request_studyguide.cgi > > Lance > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:15 PM > Subject: CISSP > > > > I've been reading up on the CISSP. While I don't have the $$$$ to attend > classes, can some of you recommend some books that you have used to obtain > your designation. > > Thanks, > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > Firewalls mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go > to: > > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco PIX > firewall? > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:52:15 +0200 > > This is a multipart message in MIME format. > --=_alternative 003B7ECCC1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > The idea is to install CheckPoint VPN-1 SecureClients (v4.1 SP5 3DES) on > external network PCs to have them vpn through the remote network Cisco PIX > firewall to our CheckPoint VPN-1/FW-1 (currently version 4.1 SP5). > > I'm lookiing for possible issues with encrypted CP packets getting through > Cisco PIX firewall - any ideas, please ? > > Thanks, > Artur > --=_alternative 003B7ECCC1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" > > > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi,</font> > <br> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The idea is to install CheckPoint VPN-1 > SecureClients (v4.1 SP5 3DES) on external network PCs to have them vpn > through the remote network Cisco PIX firewall to our CheckPoint VPN-1/FW-1 > (currently version 4.1 SP5).</font> > <br> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'm lookiing for possible issues with > encrypted CP packets getting through Cisco PIX firewall - any ideas, please > ?</font> > <br> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks,<br> > Artur</font> > --=_alternative 003B7ECCC1256BB9_=-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Subject: NT Syslog client > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:25:13 +0100 > > Hi All, > I am still looking for an NT syslog client (preferably > "freeware")............. does anybody know of one ? > All I need to be able to do is to send a user-generated record to a syslog > server on another platform using port 514. > Thanks, Gordon > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:00:20 +0200 > From: Mikael Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Clavister AB > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco > > PIXfirewall? > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > The idea is to install CheckPoint VPN-1 SecureClients (v4.1 SP5 3DES) on > > external network PCs to have them vpn through the remote network Cisco > > PIX firewall to our CheckPoint VPN-1/FW-1 (currently version 4.1 SP5). > > > > I'm lookiing for possible issues with encrypted CP packets getting > > through Cisco PIX firewall - any ideas, please ? > > Two "if"s here: > - IF the pix is picky about layer size mismatches > and > - IF checkpoint still hasn't fixed their broken encapsulation, > > the problem is probably checkpoint encapsulation building b0rken > datagrams. I don't remember the specifics, but we got a support > case a while ago with someone running checkpoint VPNs through our > boxes, and having our stuff complain about layer size mismatches. > I think it was something like the IP header saying the datagram > had 1480 bytes IP data and the UDP header saying the total UDP > length was only 1472 bytes. (These two numbers should be identical). > > As I said, I'm not 100% sure about the specifics here. I could > go dig in the support DB if you need more info. > > /Mikael > > -- > Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB > Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden > Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05 > Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com > > "Senex semper diu dormit" > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: "Clark, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: #Firewalls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: NT Syslog client > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:08:25 -0400 > > Kiwi Syslog is free. > > Steve Clark > Clark Systems Support, LLC > AVIEN Charter Member > "Who's watching your network?" > www.clarksupport.com > 301-610-9584 voice > 240-465-0323 Efax > > The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark > Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and > shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior > written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: NT Syslog client > > Hi All, > I am still looking for an NT syslog client (preferably > "freeware")............. does anybody know of one ? > All I need to be able to do is to send a user-generated record to a syslog > server on another platform using port 514. > Thanks, Gordon > > _______________________________________________ > Firewalls mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Subject: Re: Firewalls digest, Vol 1 #762 - 8 msgs > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: "Guojia Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:09:19 -0400 > > > Hi, I'm trying to evaluate low-end models from NetScreen, Cisco, and > Nokia...as i'm new to firewalls, i would greatly appreciate some direction. > from a price/performance and managebility perspective, which would you > recommend. The network i have in mind is a headquarter LAN with 20 users, > one branch office with 6 users, and 4 telecommuters. Any good/bad > experiences with any vendor?? Thanks much. > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:12:36 +0200 > From: Mikael Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Clavister AB > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: NT Syslog client > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I am still looking for an NT syslog client > > Netcat for win32 > Google for "nc.exe". > > just do: > echo "<n> My message" | nc 1.2.3.4 514 > > where n is the facility/precedence bitmask, which you > can look up in the syslog RFC (yes, they finally got > around to documenting it :)) > > > -- > Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB > Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden > Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05 > Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com > > "Senex semper diu dormit" > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:22:15 +0200 > From: Mikael Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Clavister AB > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Logging to Ciscoworks > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Using a script , syslog.conf, and "logger" there, I can get the data into > > the Ciscoworks syslog file ("syslog_info") but it doesn't have the right > > origin address, facility code, or severity level for Ciscoworks to pick > it > > up. > > Oh, that's what you meant by syslog client. (Sorry, I read your > messages in the wrong order.) > > Can't you just reformat the "syslog" data file using perl or gawk? > > The syslog format isn't _that_ advanced -- heck, even a regular > sed pattern ought to be able to fix your origin/facility/severity > strings. > > > -- > Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB > Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden > Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05 > Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com > > "Senex semper diu dormit" > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:34:42 +0800 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Bret Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: NT Syslog client > > Go to sourceforge.net - there is one there, though I can't remember exactly > the URL right now - we use it and it appears to be quite stable. > > Bret > > At 12:25 14/05/02 +0100, you wrote: > >Hi All, > >I am still looking for an NT syslog client (preferably > >"freeware")............. does anybody know of one ? > >All I need to be able to do is to send a user-generated record to a syslog > >server on another platform using port 514. > >Thanks, Gordon > > Technical Incursion Countermeasures www.ticm.com > The Insider www.ticm.com/info/insider > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > From: Vishal Mukherjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Winroute Pro > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:20:43 +0530 > > > > Hi all > No one talk of winroute pro? Is it outdateed or a very small firewall.. > > Regards > Vishal > > > Visit Our Cement Site at http://www.indorama.co.in > Our Software Site at http://www.irssl.com > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Subject: Re: CISSP > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:08:15 -0500 > > > Chris, > > I used the Information Security Handbook by Hal Tipton and Micki Kruse. > That was the only study material I used. There is also a study guide at > www.isc2.org. > > Regards, > Jeffery Gieser > > > > I've been reading up on the CISSP. While I don't have the $$$$ to attend > classes, can some of you recommend some books that you have used to obtain > your designation. > Thanks, > Chris > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CheckPoint FireWall-1 (NG) on Nokia's IP 530 throughput question > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:34:37 +0200 > > This is a multipart message in MIME format. > --=_alternative 004A5C83C1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > Can you please pass any information on the throughput (both theoretical > and practical) of CheckPoint FireWall-1 (v.4.1) on Nokia's IP 440 and 530 > ? > > Many thanks, > Artur > > --=_alternative 004A5C83C1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" > > > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi,</font> > <br> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Can you please pass any information on > the throughput (both theoretical and practical) of CheckPoint FireWall-1 > (v.4.1) on Nokia's IP 440 and 530 ?</font> > <br> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Many thanks,</font> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Artur</font> > <br> > --=_alternative 004A5C83C1256BB9_=-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CheckPoint FireWall-1 (NG) on Nokia's IP 530 throughput question > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:36:43 +0200 > > This is a multipart message in MIME format. > --=_alternative 004A8DA7C1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > Can you please pass any information on the throughput (both theoretical > and practical) of CheckPoint FireWall-1 (NG) on Nokia IP 530 ? > > Many thanks, > Artur > > --=_alternative 004A8DA7C1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" > > > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi,</font> > <br> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Can you please pass any information on > the throughput (both theoretical and practical) of CheckPoint FireWall-1 > (NG) on Nokia IP 530 ?</font> > <br> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Many thanks,</font> > <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Artur</font> > <br> > --=_alternative 004A8DA7C1256BB9_=-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 15 > To: Mikael Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco > PIXfirewall? > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:35:53 +0200 > > This is a multipart message in MIME format. > --=_alternative 004A79EBC1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Mikael, > > I'd really appreciate if you could confirm this - I really have to know if = > > I'm going to be successful with sending encrypted CP SecuRemote packets=20 > through Cisco PIX firewall before I deploy it. > > Thanks, > Artur > > > > > Mikael Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 05/14/2002 02:00 PM > > =20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client > getti= > ng through Cisco=20 > PIXfirewall? > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > The idea is to install CheckPoint VPN-1 SecureClients (v4.1 SP5 3DES) on > > external network PCs to have them vpn through the remote network Cisco > > PIX firewall to our CheckPoint VPN-1/FW-1 (currently version 4.1 SP5). > > > > I'm lookiing for possible issues with encrypted CP packets getting > > through Cisco PIX firewall - any ideas, please ? > > Two "if"s here: > - IF the pix is picky about layer size mismatches > and > - IF checkpoint still hasn't fixed their broken encapsulation, > > the problem is probably checkpoint encapsulation building b0rken > datagrams. I don't remember the specifics, but we got a support > case a while ago with someone running checkpoint VPNs through our > boxes, and having our stuff complain about layer size mismatches. > I think it was something like the IP header saying the datagram > had 1480 bytes IP data and the UDP header saying the total UDP > length was only 1472 bytes. (These two numbers should be identical). > > As I said, I'm not 100% sure about the specifics here. I could > go dig in the support DB if you need more info. > > /Mikael > > -- > Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB > Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 =D6RNSK=D6LDSVIK, Sweden > Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05 > Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com > > "Senex semper diu dormit" > > > --=_alternative 004A79EBC1256BB9_= > Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Mikael,</font> > <br> > <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">I'd really appreciate if you could c= > onfirm this - I really have to know if I'm going to be successful with send= > ing encrypted CP SecuRemote packets through Cisco PIX firewall before I dep= > loy it.</font> > <br> > <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Thanks,<br> > Artur</font> > <br> > <br> > <br> > <table width=3D100%> > <tr valign=3Dtop> > <td> > <td><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"><b>Mikael Olsson <mikael.olsson@c= > lavister.com></b></font> > <p><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">05/14/2002 02:00 PM</font> > <br> > <td><font size=3D1 face=3D"Arial"> </font> > <br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"> To: &nbs= > p; [EMAIL PROTECTED]</font> > <br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"> cc: &nbs= > p; [EMAIL PROTECTED]</font> > <br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"> Subject:= > Re: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client > g= > etting through Cisco PIXfirewall?</font></table> > <br> > <br> > <br> > <br><font size=3D2><tt>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:<br> > ><br> > > The idea is to install CheckPoint VPN-1 SecureClients (v4.1 SP5 3DES) = > on<br> > > external network PCs to have them vpn through the remote network Cisco= > <br> > > PIX firewall to our CheckPoint VPN-1/FW-1 (currently version 4.1 SP5).= > <br> > ><br> > > I'm lookiing for possible issues with encrypted CP packets getting<br> > > through Cisco PIX firewall - any ideas, please ?<br> > </tt></font> > <br><font size=3D2><tt>Two "if"s here:<br> > - IF the pix is picky about layer size mismatches<br> > and<br> > - IF checkpoint still hasn't fixed their broken encapsulation,<br> > </tt></font> > <br><font size=3D2><tt>the problem is probably checkpoint encapsulation bui= > lding b0rken<br> > datagrams. I don't remember the specifics, but we got a support<br> > case a while ago with someone running checkpoint VPNs through our<br> > boxes, and having our stuff complain about layer size mismatches.<br> > I think it was something like the IP header saying the datagram<br> > had 1480 bytes IP data and the UDP header saying the total UDP<br> > length was only 1472 bytes. (These two numbers should be identical).<br> > </tt></font> > <br><font size=3D2><tt>As I said, I'm not 100% sure about the specifics her= > e. I could<br> > go dig in the support DB if you need more info.<br> > </tt></font> > <br><font size=3D2><tt>/Mikael<br> > </tt></font> > <br><font size=3D2><tt>--<br> > Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB<br> > Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 =D6RNSK=D6LDSVIK, Sweden<br> > Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05<br> > Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com<b= > r> > </tt></font> > <br><font size=3D2><tt>"Senex semper diu dormit"</tt></font> > <br> > <br> > --=_alternative 004A79EBC1256BB9_=-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 16 > From: "Ben Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco > PIXfirewall? > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:00:40 +0200 > > 1. Set your Checkpoint client to use UDP encapsulation mode. > > 2. Configure the PIX to have a static for the FW-1, and have an access > list that permits UDP 2746 through to the FW-1 (and whatever other ACL > stuff you may need). > > Done. > > All the other solutions involve using nat 0 on the PIX which, although > it may work, isn't really recommended. > > Cheers, > > -- > Ben Nagy > Network Security Specialist > Mb: TBA PGP Key ID: 0x1A86E304 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Any experience with CheckPoint VPN client getting through Cisco > PIXfirewall? > > > > Hi, > > The idea is to install CheckPoint VPN-1 SecureClients (v4.1 SP5 3DES) on > external network PCs to have them vpn through the remote network Cisco > PIX firewall to our CheckPoint VPN-1/FW-1 (currently version 4.1 SP5). > > I'm lookiing for possible issues with encrypted CP packets getting > through Cisco PIX firewall - any ideas, please ? > > Thanks, > Artur > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Firewalls mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > > > End of Firewalls Digest > _______________________________________________ > Firewalls mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > > _______________________________________________ > Firewalls mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > > > > > ********************************************************* > * This email address does not wish to receive ANY * > * unsolicited email. Anyone sending unsolicited email * > * to this email address will be charged a US $50 fee. * > * By obtaining and using this email address you * > * agree to these terms. Failure to abide by this * > * agreement will result a comlpaint being filed to * > * the federal trade commission [EMAIL PROTECTED] * > ********************************************************* > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > _______________________________________________ > Firewalls mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to: http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
