Cari Tutti, non v'ha niente a questo mondo che non abbia una FORMA che è il risultato di un processo di TRAS-IN-FORM-AZIONE secondo il quale ogni cosa data o ogni data cosa prende FORMA in un dato tempo in cui si TRAS-IN-FORMA. aumentando o diminuendo il livello o il grado o la qualità della FORMA. Questo è l'unico modo per definire il concetto di INFORMAZIONE, la cui misurazione dipende dal tipo di INFORMAZIONE (naturale o termodinamica, genetica, matematica, semantica). Dal valore della Forma o dalla Forma del valore dipende l'apprezzamento di ogni bene o segno economico: questa è la teoria del valore della Nuova Economia che credo, fino a prova contraria, di avere inventato o scoperto. Chiedo scusa a Tutti per il mio messaggio espresso nella lingua italiana. Con umiltà, Francesco Rizzo. Grazie.
2017-10-04 19:49 GMT+02:00 <tozziart...@libero.it>: > -------- Messaggio inoltrato -------- Da: tozziart...@libero.it A: Alex > Hankey alexhan...@gmail.com Data: mercoledì, 04 ottobre 2017, 07:37PM > +02:00 Oggetto: Re[2]: [Fis] Heretic > > Dear Prof. Hankey, > I come from a free country, where everybody can say his own opinion, in > particular if his opinion is not totally stupid. > The times of Giordano Bruno and Inquisition are gone. > > -- > Inviato da Libero Mail per Android > mercoledì, 04 ottobre 2017, 06:20PM +02:00 da Alex Hankey > alexhan...@gmail.com: > > > Dear Professor Tozzi, > > Might I suggest that you graciously retire from the list, > as you evidently do not wish to participate in what > the rest of us find fascinating topics of discussion. > > As a physicist, I have no difficulty in relating to the concept of > 'information', > and I am aware of no less than five conceptually totally different > mathematical structures, all of which merit the name, 'information'. > > With all good wishes, > > Alex Hankey > > > On 4 October 2017 at 02:30, <tozziart...@libero.it> wrote: > > Dear FISers, > After the provided long list of completely different definitions of the > term "information", one conclusion is clear: there is not a scientific, > unique definition of information. > > Nobody of us is able to provide an operative framework and a single (just > one!) empirical testable prevision able to assess "information". > For example, what does "semantics" and "meaning" mean, in empirical terms? > Therefore, to talk about information is meaningless, in the carnapian > sense. > > Judging from your answers, the most of you are foremost scientists. > Therefore, my proposal is to forget about information, and to use your > otherwise very valuable skills and efforts in other fields. > It is a waste of your precious time to focus yourself in something that > is so vague. It is, retrospectively, a mistake to state that the world is > information, if nobody knows what does it mean. > > -- > Inviato da Libero Mail per Android > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > > > > > -- > Alex Hankey M.A. (Cantab.) PhD (M.I.T.) > Distinguished Professor of Yoga and Physical Science, > SVYASA, Eknath Bhavan, 19 Gavipuram Circle > Bangalore 560019, Karnataka, India > Mobile (Intn'l): +44 7710 534195 <+44%207710%20534195> > Mobile (India) +91 900 800 8789 <+91%2090080%2008789> > ____________________________________________________________ > > 2015 JPBMB Special Issue on Integral Biomathics: Life Sciences, > Mathematics and Phenomenological Philosophy > <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00796107/119/3> > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > >
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
