Dear Arturo, Sorry for my naive question, but isn't the named set theory something different from the set theory? Best, Michel.
2018-03-22 7:48 GMT+01:00 <tozziart...@libero.it>: > Dear Mark, > the named set theory does not solve the Russell paradox. > Therefore it would be better to use, in such approaches, the best theory > available, i.e., the Fraenkel-Zermelo sets. > In turn, the latter displays some limits: for example, the need of a set with > infinite elements. > Therefore, set theory is not able to tackle information problems. > You have to go back to other mathematical approaches. . . . > Arturo Tozzi > AA Professor Physics, University North Texas > Pediatrician ASL Na2Nord, Italy > Comput Intell Lab, University Manitoba > http://arturotozzi.webnode.it/ > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > _______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
