Pedro -- Your list: physical, biological, social, and Informational
is implicitly a hierarchy -- in fact, a subsumptive hierarchy, with the physical subsuming the biological and the biological subsuming the social. But where should information appear? Following Wheeler, we should have: {informational {physicochemical {biological {social}}}} STAN On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan < pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es> wrote: > Thanks, Ken. I think your previous message and this one are drawing sort > of the border-lines of the discussion. Achieving a comprehensive view on > the interrelationship between computation and information is an essential > matter. In my opinion, and following the Vienna discussions, whenever life > cycles are involved and meaningfully "touched", there is info; while the > mere info circulation according to fixed rules and not impinging on any > life-cycle relevant aspect, may be taken as computation. The distinction > between both may help to consider more clearly the relationship between the > four great domains of sceince: physical, biological, social, and > Informational. If we adopt a pan-computationalist stance, the information > turn of societies, of bioinformation, neuroinformation, etc. merely reduces > to applying computer technologies. I think this would be a painful error, > repeating the big mistake of 60s-70s, when people band-wagon to developed > the sciences of the artificial and reduced the nascent info science to > library science. People like Alex Pentland (his "social physics" 2014) are > again taking the wrong way... Anyhow, it was nicer talking face to face as > we did in the past conference! > > best ---Pedro > > Ken Herold wrote: > >> FIS: >> >> Sorry to have been too disruptive in my restarting discussion post--I did >> not intend to substitute for the Information Science thread an alternative >> way of philosophy or computing. The references I listed are indicative of >> some bad thinking as well as good ideas to reflect upon. Our focus is >> information and I would like to hear how you might believe the formal >> relational scheme of Rosenbloom could be helpful? >> >> Ken >> >> -- >> Ken Herold >> Director, Library Information Systems >> Hamilton College >> 198 College Hill Road >> Clinton, NY 13323 >> 315-859-4487 >> kher...@hamilton.edu <mailto:kher...@hamilton.edu> >> > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > Pedro C. Marijuán > Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group > Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud > Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA) > Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X > 50009 Zaragoza, Spain > Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818) > pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es > http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/ > ------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis >
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis