On 1/20/06, Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/20/06, Philip Ganchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/20/06, Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [...] I find it to be an ocasionally useful for short > > > functions with no description - you get to see what the function does > > > as a description. > > [...] > > > > > > Fish has always behaved this way. Perhaps this behaviour should be > > > limited to shorter functions, but I do find that it is more usefull > > > than to simply use 'Function' as the description. > > > > I think the body should be ellipsized as space allows, for describing > > function completions. > > Descriptions are always ellipsized as space allows, and fish already > prioritizes the completion over the description when ellipsizing. > > > > > But it should not show in duplicate when using the 'functions' > > builtin, it should not mention a description if none is defined. > > > > Are there duplicates today? Not that I can see. Can you describe what you > mean?
Sorry, I mean the description is a duplicate of the function body. If a function is defined without a description, the `functions' builtin should only print the function's body; it should print no description. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
