Egon Kocjan wrote in reply to Christopher Pinon:

>> I don't really doubt that if I updated gcc (and perhaps glibc?), then
>> I would be able to compile fish. The practical problem is that it's
>> an older machine with limited disk space. Moreover, the vast majority
>> of C programs that I want to compile on it do actually compile with
>> gcc-2.95. It's a bit sad that fish doesn't.

> Actually, gcc 3.4 works even with glibc 2.1, but fish wouldn't work,
> since glibc has unicode support (wide char functions) since 2.2. You
> just need to build gcc 2.95.x first on such ancient systems, before
> compiling 3.4.

> I have compiled fish on my debian woody installation (glibc 2.2.5) and
> it seems, that it only requires 2.2.3. You can download it here:
> http://razor.arnes.si/~ssdekocj/fish/old/

Thanks, Egon, for making this binary available---I'll try it out. 
However, since I would have this problem every time that a new version 
of fish appeared, I should consider finding another solution (asuming 
that I would like to use fish on my old machine). It's good to know that 
I could upgrade gcc-2.95.3 without upgrading glibc-2.2.3 as well. By the 
way, I've noticed that a binary gcc-3.0 is available for my (old) 
distribution. Would gcc-3.0 be worth trying?

Christopher


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users

Reply via email to