On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:54:13AM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: > >yes, but it makes me think that this is something that can be shared > >across multiple machines. global makes me think of system-wide (consider > >the term "world-readable" actually meaning readable system-wide.) > world-readable sound to me like everybody having read access, and > implies that not everybody would have write access.
my point was on: global = world = everybody = system wide and therefore global != within one shell session. greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the world -- pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.org unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at administrator (caudium|gotpike).org is.schon.org Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
