Welcome Neil! > On Aug 24, 2016, at 5:23 AM, fish-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: > > Send Fish-users mailing list submissions to > fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fish-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fish-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Fish-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Default fish shell coloring not appearing (Pito Salas) > 2. Re: Default fish shell coloring not appearing (Kurtis Rader) > 3. Re: Default fish shell coloring not appearing (Pito Salas) > 4. New Member (barn...@drofle.co.uk) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:17:37 -0400 > From: Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Fish-users] Default fish shell coloring not appearing > To: Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us> > Cc: fish-users Mailing List <fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Message-ID: <ba69c37d-78e9-460c-97f5-b66d44209...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Interesting. There are a variety of differences, but the first one is > especially interesting. Notice the first line, > ?__fish_classic_git_prompt_initialized?. Is that important? Do you see any > other clues? > > SET U ON COMPUTER WHERE SHELL USES BLACK TEXT ON WHITE BACKGROUND: > > __fish_classic_git_prompt_initialized > __fish_init_1_50_0 > __fish_init_2_3_0 > fish_color_autosuggestion 555 > fish_color_command 005fd7 > fish_color_comment 990000 > fish_color_cwd green > fish_color_cwd_root red > fish_color_end 009900 > fish_color_error ff0000 > fish_color_escape cyan > fish_color_history_current cyan > fish_color_host normal > fish_color_match cyan > fish_color_normal normal > fish_color_operator cyan > fish_color_param 00afff > fish_color_quote 999900 > fish_color_redirection 00afff > fish_color_search_match --background=purple > fish_color_selection --background=purple > fish_color_status red > fish_color_user green > fish_color_valid_path --underline > fish_greeting Welcome\ to\ fish,\ the\ friendly\ interactive\ shell\nType\ > \e\[32mhe? > fish_key_bindings fish_default_key_bindings > fish_pager_color_completion normal > fish_pager_color_description '555' 'yellow' > fish_pager_color_prefix cyan > fish_pager_color_progress cyan > fisher_active_prompt mono > fisher_dependency_count 'git_util' 'pwd_is_home' 'pwd_info' 'host_info' > 'last_job_id' 'humanize'? > > > > AND HERE IS FOR THE COMPUTER WHERE FISH SHELL USES COLORS > > __fish_init_1_50_0 > __fish_init_2_3_0 > fish_color_autosuggestion '555' 'yellow' > fish_color_command '005fd7' 'purple' > fish_color_comment red > fish_color_cwd green > fish_color_cwd_root red > fish_color_end green > fish_color_error 'red' '--bold' > fish_color_escape cyan > fish_color_history_current cyan > fish_color_host normal > fish_color_match cyan > fish_color_normal normal > fish_color_operator cyan > fish_color_param '00afff' 'cyan' > fish_color_quote brown > fish_color_redirection normal > fish_color_search_match --background=purple > fish_color_selection --background=purple > fish_color_user green > fish_color_valid_path --underline > fish_greeting Welcome\ to\ fish,\ the\ friendly\ interactive\ shell\nType\ > \e\[32mhe? > fish_key_bindings fish_default_key_bindings > fish_pager_color_completion normal > fish_pager_color_description '555' 'yellow' > fish_pager_color_prefix cyan > fish_pager_color_progress cyan > > > >> On Aug 1, 2016, at 8:36 PM, Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> computer one: xterm 2.3.0 >> computer two: xterm 2.3.1 >> >> If you run `set -U` on each system and compare the output are they truly the >> same? Also, "xterm" only supports eight colors. Fish has a heuristic to >> treat that as "xterm-256color" in certain situations but I don't recall off >> the top of my head if iTerm2 on macOS is one of them. In any case for the >> benefit of your other programs you should `set -gx TERM xterm-256color`. Try >> some controlled experiments such as >> >> echo (set_color -b white green)hello(set_color normal) >> >> Do you see the same green text on a white background on both systems? >>> On Aug 1, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us> wrote: >>> >>> What is $TERM $FISH_VERSION on each system? >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I?ve been using Fish for a month now and loving it. >>> >>> I am using it on two computers. >>> >>> One one (mac air) the shell properly colors different syntactic elements >>> just like the screenshots show on the site >>> >>> On the other, the shell displays white text on a black background. >>> >>> As far as I know I am using the exact same configuration >>> >>> In both cases I am using the latest version of iTerm2 >>> >>> In both cases the same version of El Cap. >>> >>> I am not sure where to look to sort this out. The only reason it matters is >>> if it?s an indication of some other more important problem. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Pito >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fish-users mailing list >>> Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kurtis Rader >>> Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Kurtis Rader >> Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:30:31 -0700 > From: Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us> > Subject: Re: [Fish-users] Default fish shell coloring not appearing > To: Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> > Cc: fish-users Mailing List <fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Message-ID: > <CABx2=d-8q2ufb-e+3juybed_3fy6hly+trkl-qmok+0g-xy...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > The key difference is probably this entry: > > fisher_active_prompt mono > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Interesting. There are a variety of differences, but the first one is >> especially interesting. Notice the first line, >> ?__fish_classic_git_prompt_initialized?. Is that important? Do you see any >> other clues? >> >> SET U ON COMPUTER WHERE SHELL USES BLACK TEXT ON WHITE BACKGROUND: >> >> __fish_classic_git_prompt_initialized >> __fish_init_1_50_0 >> __fish_init_2_3_0 >> fish_color_autosuggestion 555 >> fish_color_command 005fd7 >> fish_color_comment 990000 >> fish_color_cwd green >> fish_color_cwd_root red >> fish_color_end 009900 >> fish_color_error ff0000 >> fish_color_escape cyan >> fish_color_history_current cyan >> fish_color_host normal >> fish_color_match cyan >> fish_color_normal normal >> fish_color_operator cyan >> fish_color_param 00afff >> fish_color_quote 999900 >> fish_color_redirection 00afff >> fish_color_search_match --background=purple >> fish_color_selection --background=purple >> fish_color_status red >> fish_color_user green >> fish_color_valid_path --underline >> fish_greeting Welcome\ to\ fish,\ the\ friendly\ interactive\ shell\nType\ >> \e\[32mhe? >> fish_key_bindings fish_default_key_bindings >> fish_pager_color_completion normal >> fish_pager_color_description '555' 'yellow' >> fish_pager_color_prefix cyan >> fish_pager_color_progress cyan >> fisher_active_prompt mono >> fisher_dependency_count 'git_util' 'pwd_is_home' 'pwd_info' >> 'host_info' 'last_job_id' 'humanize'? >> >> >> >> AND HERE IS FOR THE COMPUTER WHERE FISH SHELL USES COLORS >> >> __fish_init_1_50_0 >> __fish_init_2_3_0 >> fish_color_autosuggestion '555' 'yellow' >> fish_color_command '005fd7' 'purple' >> fish_color_comment red >> fish_color_cwd green >> fish_color_cwd_root red >> fish_color_end green >> fish_color_error 'red' '--bold' >> fish_color_escape cyan >> fish_color_history_current cyan >> fish_color_host normal >> fish_color_match cyan >> fish_color_normal normal >> fish_color_operator cyan >> fish_color_param '00afff' 'cyan' >> fish_color_quote brown >> fish_color_redirection normal >> fish_color_search_match --background=purple >> fish_color_selection --background=purple >> fish_color_user green >> fish_color_valid_path --underline >> fish_greeting Welcome\ to\ fish,\ the\ friendly\ interactive\ shell\nType\ >> \e\[32mhe? >> fish_key_bindings fish_default_key_bindings >> fish_pager_color_completion normal >> fish_pager_color_description '555' 'yellow' >> fish_pager_color_prefix cyan >> fish_pager_color_progress cyan >> >> >> >>> On Aug 1, 2016, at 8:36 PM, Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> computer one: xterm 2.3.0 >>> computer two: xterm 2.3.1 >>> >>> If you run `set -U` on each system and compare the output are they truly >> the same? Also, "xterm" only supports eight colors. Fish has a heuristic to >> treat that as "xterm-256color" in certain situations but I don't recall off >> the top of my head if iTerm2 on macOS is one of them. In any case for the >> benefit of your other programs you should `set -gx TERM xterm-256color`. >> Try some controlled experiments such as >>> >>> echo (set_color -b white green)hello(set_color normal) >>> >>> Do you see the same green text on a white background on both systems? >>>> On Aug 1, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> What is $TERM $FISH_VERSION on each system? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I?ve been using Fish for a month now and loving it. >>>> >>>> I am using it on two computers. >>>> >>>> One one (mac air) the shell properly colors different syntactic >> elements just like the screenshots show on the site >>>> >>>> On the other, the shell displays white text on a black background. >>>> >>>> As far as I know I am using the exact same configuration >>>> >>>> In both cases I am using the latest version of iTerm2 >>>> >>>> In both cases the same version of El Cap. >>>> >>>> I am not sure where to look to sort this out. The only reason it >> matters is if it?s an indication of some other more important problem. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Pito >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fish-users mailing list >>>> Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Kurtis Rader >>>> Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kurtis Rader >>> Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank >> >> > > > -- > Kurtis Rader > Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:24:49 -0400 > From: Pito Salas <pitosa...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Fish-users] Default fish shell coloring not appearing > To: Kurtis Rader <kra...@skepticism.us> > Cc: fish-users Mailing List <fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Message-ID: <f34f4ce3-b5bd-47fc-84b3-aa20929cc...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > One experiment I just did: I ran Terminal.app (the default terminal emulator > on Mac OS X) and the fish color scheme appeared as it is supposed to. On the > other hand when I ran iTerm2.app (a very popular alternative) all the text is > black on a white background. So it must be something about the setup of > iTerm2. Given that evidence, do you have a further idea maybe? I looked at > the settings and everything seems ok. Thoughts? > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:11:48 +0100 > From: barn...@drofle.co.uk > Subject: [Fish-users] New Member > To: fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Message-ID: <63580116-6368-bdc8-8dae-857c3155f...@drofle.co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I have just joined the list, so I thought to say hello. I am retired and > I use Linux only, Xubuntu 16.04. I have used bash as my shell up to now, > but decided to look elsewhere. My main problem is that bash arithmetic > uses integers only. I know there are ways round this using bc, but it is > a bit of a pain. > > I have looked at zsh but did not get on with it at all. Blame me. Then I > came across Fish and so far am well impressed. Floating point numbers > are fine for addition, subtraction and multiplication. As ever it is > division, and square roots, which can cause a problem. Either you get no > decimal places or too many. > > However I have found a way round that, using bc and the scale parameter. > So now I can work with division and square roots and get as many, or as > few, decimal places as I need. Great. > > So hello to all members, and thanks for all the hard work done with the > Fish shell. > > Best regards, > > Neil > > > > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Fish-users mailing list > Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users > > > End of Fish-users Digest, Vol 116, Issue 3 > ******************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
