[This message was posted by David Rosenborg of Pantor Engineering AB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/0fb2253b - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
The intention is that they may appear in any order (your alt. 3). This would also be consistent with static template references which may appear before the template they refer to. /David > In regards to the new Type Definition proposal: > > <define name="MyString"> <string/> </define> <template name="MyTpl"> > <field name="Foo"> <type name="MyString"/> </field> </template> > > Are there any restrictions to the location of the type definition? > For example: > 1. Do all of the type definitions appear before template definitions? > 2. Does a type definition have to appear before it is referenced? > 3. Or can a field reference a type that has not been defined yet? [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
