[This message was posted by Russell Curry of Assimilate Technology, Inc.
<r...@assimilate.com> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/56216e4c - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
> Please post feedback, comments, and questions as replies to this
> discussion thread.
Hi All,
>From 3.1 of the document:
"At this point, session-level changes are outside the scope of this gap
analysis."
I'm just curious about something with respect to things like message throttling
- isn't that the whole point of having seperated the session layer from the
application layer in FIX 5.0/TIF?
Why would any of this be implemented at the application layer in a FIX-based
application? It just seems like this is so naturally suited to the session
layer of the system - e.g. this is what a session layer is all about in the
first place, why would this need to impact session layer messages?
I'm just curious in terms of the need for application layer message changes to
support this kind of thing...
Thanks,
Russ
[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to
mailto:unsubscribe+100932...@fixprotocol.org]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to fix-proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
fix-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
