[This message was posted by Russell Curry of Assimilate Technology, Inc. <r...@assimilate.com> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/efeb4b76 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hi All, >From 3.1 of the document: "At this point, session-level changes are outside the scope of this gap analysis." I'm just curious about something with respect to things like message throttling - isn't that the whole point of having seperated the session layer from the application layer in FIX 5.0/TIF? Why would any of this be implemented at the application layer in a FIX-based application? It just seems like this is so naturally suited to the session layer of the system - e.g. this is what a session layer is all about in the first place, why would this need to impact application layer messages? I'm just curious in terms of the need for application layer message changes to support this kind of thing... Thanks, Russ > The public comment period ends on April 2, 2010. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:unsubscribe+100932...@fixprotocol.org] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to fix-proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fix-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
