[This message was posted by Jim Northey of The LaSalle Technology Group <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/6f6b1869 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
What specific roadblocks are you referring to? The issue I am aware of that can be resolved by enhancements to the repository have to do with what is contained in a FIXT repository and what is contained in the FIX5 repository and then how do you configure at FIXT+FIX5 repository either statically or dynamically. The other issue is a controversial design feature that most vendors have addressed and that is the ability to specify DefaultApplVersID on the logon message which requires state information outside of a particular instance. This is Application Version Independence. > Hi Jim, > > But what about people who wish to implement application version > independence or transport independence and have hit a road block > implementing FIXT.1.1 due to its limitations ? I guess we need a > survey to find out adoption of FIXT.1.1 + FIX.5.0 in the real world. > Then we could decide if we need a FIXT.1.2 to overcome limitations of > FIXT.1.1 :-) > > Regards, > K. Mahesh > > > My recommendation is to not create a FIXT.1.2. Instead let people use > > 8=FIX.5.x if they don't need application or transport independence. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
