[This message was posted by Hanno Klein of Deutsche Börse Systems 
<[email protected]> to the "4.4 Changes" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/17. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/4a90e8d8 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

Agree that this use case is not covered yet. You can use values of 100 and 
above until there is a standard value. Maybe this can be added to the next gap 
analysis being submitted in the area of quote handling by somebody. The list of 
standard valid values cannot be extended on the basis of forum entries alone.

> Tag 368 'QuoteEntryRejectReason' does not support an enumeration to cover an 
> instrument being suspended. Would seem like a logical addition to the spec 
> unless there is another tag I should be using for this? 'Exchange Closed' is 
> probably closest but misleading.


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.

  • [FIX] Re: Suspended Instruments '4 . 4 Changes' forum at fixprotocol . org

Reply via email to