[This message was posted by Jeffrey Croft of Plus Markets Group <[email protected]> to the "4.4 Changes" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/17. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/8eeb0ea9 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Thanks for the reply. I guess for now we will use a field above 100 to support this. > Agree that this use case is not covered yet. You can use values of 100 and > above until there is a standard value. Maybe this can be added to the next > gap analysis being submitted in the area of quote handling by somebody. The > list of standard valid values cannot be extended on the basis of forum > entries alone. > > > Tag 368 'QuoteEntryRejectReason' does not support an enumeration to cover > > an instrument being suspended. Would seem like a logical addition to the > > spec unless there is another tag I should be using for this? 'Exchange > > Closed' is probably closest but misleading. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
