This message is from: "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Ingrid wrote:
"...I came across an ad on the net for a fjord mare...turned out to be an
arab/fjord cross. I wish people wouldn't represent these crosses as anything
other than what they are...."

Well, ya gotta consider the $$$ factor. When an "everyday" arab can be
bought for under a $1000 US and an "everyday" Fjord goes for considerably
more than that, there's a great financial incentive for unethical persons to
make lots of crossbred babies and pass them as purebred Fjords. I find that
kind of deception totally disgusting, not to mention fairly illegal (bait
and switch comes to mind).

However, as the grandaughter of a respected breeder of purebred Yorkshire
hogs and as the sister of brothers who raise crossbred market hogs, I'll say
this:  There will always a place for purebred animals, whether equine or
porcine. There will also always be a legitimate place for crossbreds -- but
ONLY IF the crossbreds show vigor, characteristics, or abilities that
surpass the purebred parents AND only if the crossbreds are clearly and
responsibly marketed as such. There's no inherent wrongness in crossbreeding
the Fjord -- rather, it's the intent of the breeder doing the crossbreeding
that is good or bad. Now that I've made my sacrilegeous point  ;-)  I'll go
on to say that I basically am uncomfortable with the idea of crossbreeding
Fjords for a couple of reasons:

Recently, Anne Appleby attested that the crossbred Fjords she has seen are
inferior in temperament and conformation to either of the parents. Based on
that observation by an astute horseperson, I would tend to disapprove of
crossbreeding the Fjord because the crossbred offspring are decidely
inferior to the parents. Perhaps other experienced people have other
opinions, but until I hear from them, I'm inclined to respect Anne's point
of view.

The other factor that weighs against Fjord crosses is the rarity of the
Fjord in North America. Crossbreeding Fjords could result in a decrease in
the purebred Fjord population if people bought crossbreds in preference to
more costly purebreds. In essence, the crossbreds could compete with
purebreds for "market share". However, as long as the purebred Fjord
registries in Canada and US require DNA testing of horses, the idea of
diluting the purebred gene pool with "foreign" genes introduced by unethical
breeders seems less likely than it would have been in the days before DNA
testing was available.

DeeAnna

Reply via email to