On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:36:23AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Well, the packages we are having trouble here are: > flac 1.1.0 (let me check... libOggFLAC version-info 1:2:0) > debian package: liboggflac1 (matches libtool soname - ok) > > oggflac 1.1.0 not forward or backwards compatible with 1.0.4 -> ok. > oggflac 1.1.1 not forward or backwards compatible with 1.1.0 -> problem. > > So, it looks to me that liboggflac 1.1.1 should have version-info 2:1:0. > This is based on what you told us about the OggFLAC__StreamDecoderState enum > entries changing position. Thank you. What I said about the enum was between 1.0.4 and 1.1.1. But you are correct. 1.1.0 has version-info 1:2:0 and also does not include the new streaming api or the enum reordering. So the update to 2:1:1 in the 1.1.1 release was incorrect. I should have been 2:0:0. (2:1:0 works too.) > > If, in fact, the underlying C library is somehow exposed in > > liboggflac++ then, as you suggest, we do have a problem there. > > I didn't check for that one. If you believe there is not, then I have no > reason to think there is a leak. It was just a heads'up since we were > talking about such issues anyway... As I said, I'm not qualified to evaluate this. Josh, got a comment on this? Want me to do a 1.1.2 to resolve this? -r _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev