No, this has been addressed before. The FLAC format has no compression levels
or even any encoding parameters that cannot be gleaned from the frame headers.
Everything else is implementation-specific and doesn't need official metadata
support for.
>________________________________
> From: Olav Sunde <o...@olavsunde.net>
>To: flac-dev@xiph.org
>Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 3:16 AM
>Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Meet the new maintainer
>
>
>At 09:33 02.02.2012, you wrote:
>Thanks Erik, I'll check back.
>
>This next is a feature request: Today it is not possible to know the
encoding of a flac archive. Many new devices support playback of flac,
however tiny processors sometimes have a hard time decoding files with
the default encoding of -5 or higher, resulting in unstable playback or
even reduced audio quality. A re-encoding to -0 often solve these
issues.
>Can you look at a way to store parameters used for encoding in an archive
so we can check it later?
>
>Best regards
>
>Olav Sunde
>
>
>
>Olav Sunde wrote:
>>
>>> very good to see activity on flac development again. I am not a
developer
>>> unfortunately, but I'd like to check with you if updating code
for
>>> flac/metaflac to handle high-rez files (24/192 or higher) for
writing Replay
>>> Gain tags is in your 'pile' of things to fix?
>>
>>I think there are patches to do that in the queue. Perhaps you can
check
>>back in two weeks or so.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Erik
>>--
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Erik de Castro Lopo
>>http://www.mega-nerd.com/
>>_______________________________________________
>>flac-dev mailing list
>>flac-dev@xiph.org
>>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
>_______________________________________________
>flac-dev mailing list
>flac-dev@xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
