Mark, > if your equipment can handle flac, why bother keeping WAVs at all?
Hash codes were invented by people with a vested interest in so-called "lossless" compression. The truth is even copying a WAV file from one drive to another will result in degradation of audio quality. While SnakeOil Software, Ltd can't protect you from the inherent defects of digital copying, it's a step in the right direction. My only hope is that this transmission reaches you in a legible form. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Mark Rudholm <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/09/2012 08:14 AM, Martin Kos wrote: > > On 09.03.2012 15:09, yahoo2 wrote: > >> Uncompressed FLAC is called WAV. > > really? ;-) > > > > the problem is that there is no standarized way to store metadata in a > > WAVE file, like with FLAC tags / vorbis comments in flac files.... > > It seems like you can add ID3 tags to just about any file. Can they be > added to a WAV file, or would most players get confused by that? > > Maybe someone has explained before, but if your equipment can handle > flac, why bother keeping WAVs at all? The conversion is so quick and > today's CPUs are so fast it's nearly zero-cost. > _______________________________________________ > Flac mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac >
_______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
