Dennis Brunnenmeyer wrote: ... > A new > set of recommendations for FLAC tags (in the VorbisComments format) is > more than just desirable---it's essential for the future adaptation of > FLAC for music distribution. A revised codified standard for > VorbisComments or their equivalent is required.
I am not sure what it is you seek from Xiph.org. The vast majority of FLAC (and Vorbis) users are not concerned with music distribution. Hence, a long all-inclusive list of VorbisComments is not relevant to them, and in the past Xiph.org has shied away from specifying such a list. Of course, there is nothing to stop you defining such a list, and publishing it on a website somewhere. One initiative to standardize "kitchen sink" metadata was M3F; visit: https://wiki.xiph.org/M3F However, the M3F initiative seems to have died in 2008. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ _______________________________________________ Flac mailing list Flac@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac