The difference can either be small or from
200-300 K. Is adding welch to libflac a good
idea? Would you like access to any of the files?
At 08:17 AM 9/29/2022, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
Op di 27 sep. 2022 om 17:10 schreef Michael D.
Lawler <<mailto:mdlaw...@lawlers.us>mdlaw...@lawlers.us>:
These are all 44.1kHz and adding -b 4608 helped,
but ffmpeg still does better than flac for this handful of files.
Then I think the remaining difference might be
in the apodization used by ffmpeg. I think
ffmpeg uses a welch window, whereas
libFLACÂ uses a rather complicated arrangement
of brute-forcing various windows approaches, not including welch.
If that is not it, I presume the file size
differences in these files are very small?
Â
--
Michael D. Lawler
email mailto:mdlaw...@lawlers.us
_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
Flac@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
