Yeah, the new non-annoying library panel is almost worth the upgrade price on its own...
Alias On 10/27/05, Judah Frangipane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd upgrade to Flash 8 even though you are doing Flash 6 and 7. It has a > lot of little things that make development quicker. So even though you > are exporting to Flash 7 you can still take advantage of the new text > resizing handles (something I use everyday) and other neat little > changes. Or wait until 8.2 update (if one comes out). > > Best, > Judah > > Gregory wrote: > > >Hello flashcoders, > > > >I haven't upgrade to Flash 8 so far. Of course I'll do it soon ;-). > >But I have already read some of the manuals (AS reference, components > etc) > > > >New features are great, definitely worth buying/using/migrating. > >The only question is "when"? > > > >Example: > >My product, Dynamic Blend v.2 Flash MX 2004 component, uses Color class > (Flash 5-7). > >Have a look: http://www.gousable.com/flash/dynBlend.html > > > >Now in Flash 8 Color class became deprecated (in favor of the > flash.geom.ColorTransform class). > >No doubt flash.geom.ColorTransform class is better, but it's > "flash8-only". > > > >Most other deprecated functions are from Flash 4, so I think Color > >class will be supported until version 10 (or even 12 ;-). > > > >On the other hand, during the last year approx. 80% of my clients require > compatibility with > >Flash Player 6, and approx 30% - with Flash Player 5! > > > >If possible, I don't want to force user to install something... > > > >I'd like to hear your opinion regarding this. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
