I understand Chris. On 3/2/06, Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/2/06, elibol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris, the evidence being collected at OSFlash should only serve to > bestow > > the ownership of the patent to someone else. I apologize, but I would > need > > help understanding what else this kind of documentation could prove. The > > problem would persist, am I wrong? > > > > M. > > > > You know, I don't think that is the case. The documenting of other > cases simply proves that it's not a unique idea, thus it invalidates > the patent for anyone. > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > To change your subscription options or search the archive: > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training > http://www.figleaf.com > http://training.figleaf.com > _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
