Hi, I recently purchased Zinc to simply have more control over the window
(placement, title, icon - that's all I wanted for this project!!) and it is
causing issues with my program.
I use the following code to create some movie clips:
for (var i=0;i<count;i++)
{
filePath = pstrFolderPath + swatchNameArray[i];
paLoadedSwatchClips.push(new swatch(this, pobjMainRef, pmcSWFHolder, i,
filePath, theCounterValues[i]));
}
The swatch class has the following code that actually creates the clips:
loadListener.onLoadInit = function(target_mc:MovieClip)
{
trace(target_mc + ' is done loading' + ' !! ' + thisRef.pnID);
var mdm = _global.mdm;
mdm.Exception.DebugWindow.trace(target_mc + ' is done loading' + ' !! ' +
thisRef.pnID, mdm.ASYNC)
thisRef.pmcLoadedClip = target_mc; // Set reference for calling play and stop
thisRef.pobjSetRef.mClipDone();
// Store height before we put textfield on there
thisRef.pnMyHeight = target_mc._height;
thisRef.mCreateCounter(initialCount);
}
mcLoader.addListener(loadListener);
var thePath = _global.mdm.Application.path + swfPath;
mcLoader.loadClip(swfPath, pmcButton);
My trace statements in Flash are in order - 0,1,2.....
I am using Flash MX 2004.
When I run it through Zinc, and when customer support runs my files, the trace
statements are reversed - 2,1,0
I guess I'm wondering if load order has changed since 2004 version... This
problem is breaking this part of my program when I run it through Zinc, and
want to know if it is Zinc, or an issue with Flash?
Any help would be appreciated,
Jason
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
