not sure about accessibility changes.. but SEO changes are kinda
pointless in most cases.. i wrote an article on flash SEO a while
back that might interest you (and others on the list):
http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/03/13/modern-approach-flash-seo/
On Oct 31, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
Merrill, Jason wrote:
Video capabilities can be a big seller - also the fact most people
have
it now is another. The much enhanced security of the 8 player
could be
your Ace of Spades though. Might be hard to convince them that the
blur, dropshadow, glow etc. effects you can do dynamically would be
worth it, but its' a shot. I would just look at the Adobe Flash
homepage at all the new features and use that as argument.
What about accessability/use-ability/SEO-friendly aspects?
Has F8 improved these things? Or, is Flex2 the better option if the
above things are important to a client/boss?
Got any links that talk about accessability/use-ability/SEO-
friendly aspects and FLash?
Sorry for ignorance... I have taken a break from Flash for a bit
now, but am still a member of the list to keep-up with the
conversations.
Cheers,
Micky
--
Wishlist: <http://snipurl.com/vrs9>
Switch: <http://browsehappy.com/>
BCC?: <http://snipurl.com/w6f8>
My: <http://del.icio.us/mhulse>
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
