well, that's all well and good saying it seems silly, but the internet browsed from a desktop machine will rapidly become the minority of the internet userbase.
so then what? adobe has a browser plugin that's selling point is 99% penetration. well they can't say that anymore seeing as they are abandoning flash as a mobile platform. so it becomes 99% of desktop computers. not exactly great if desktop users make up less than half of the target audience... On 9 November 2011 16:19, Paul Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/11/2011 14:39, Henrik Andersson wrote: > >> I see no reason why flash 11 would be the last player version. In fact, >> the article is quite clear that Adobe does not mind it if other parties >> were to port their players (providing they properly license it of >> course), just that they will no longer do it themselves. >> >> The indirectly linked to blog post also outright states that Adobe is >> working on a new version of the Flash player. >> >> So in short, Adobe just dropped their own port of the Flash player. >> > > Only on mobile platforms.. > > I think their problem is that Apple and Windows Mobile IE wont have the > plugin, so it seems silly to invest in a mobile plugin technology that only > addresses part of the mobile space. It's different when it comes to air > deployment and the desktop. > > Paul > > ______________________________**_________________ >> Flashcoders mailing list >> [email protected].**com <[email protected]> >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders<http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected].**com <[email protected]> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders<http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
