Am 21.07.2011 02:41 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
> Here's the fix with no message changes. I think that part is where we
> both agree. Please note that a separate followup patch with improved
> messages (either from you or from me) is also very desirable for 0.9.4,
> and by now I pretty much agree with your reasoning.
>   

And here are the pure message changes on top.
AFAICS they should be mostly what you created yourself and a few small
tweaks by me, so it should probably carry your signoff. In the meantime,
this has my signoff to make sure nobody thinks the patch is restricted.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>

--- flashrom-cosmetics_blockwalker_read_write_error/flashrom.c  2011-07-21 
02:50:59.000000000 +0200
+++ flashrom-cosmetics_blockwalker_read_write_error/flashrom.c  2011-07-21 
03:00:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -1526,15 +1526,14 @@
                        msg_cdbg("No usable erase functions left.\n");
                        break;
                }
-               msg_cdbg("Looking at blockwise erase function %i... ", k);
+               msg_cdbg("Trying erase function %i... ", k);
                if (check_block_eraser(flash, k, 1)) {
                        msg_cdbg("Looking for another erase function.\n");
                        continue;
                }
                usable_erasefunctions--;
-               msg_cdbg("trying... ");
-               ret = walk_eraseregions(flash, k, 
&erase_and_write_block_helper, curcontents, newcontents);
-               msg_cdbg("\n");
+               ret = walk_eraseregions(flash, k, &erase_and_write_block_helper,
+                                       curcontents, newcontents);
                /* If everything is OK, don't try another erase function. */
                if (!ret)
                        break;
@@ -1544,14 +1543,19 @@
                 */
                if (!usable_erasefunctions)
                        continue;
+               /* Reading the whole chip may take a while, inform the user even
+                * in non-verbose mode.
+                */
+               msg_cinfo("Reading current flash chip contents... ");
                if (flash->read(flash, curcontents, 0, size)) {
                        /* Now we are truly screwed. Read failed as well. */
-                       msg_cerr("Can't read anymore!\n");
+                       msg_cerr("Can't read anymore! Aborting.\n");
                        /* We have no idea about the flash chip contents, so
                         * retrying with another erase function is pointless.
                         */
                        break;
                }
+               msg_cinfo("done. Trying next erase function.\n");
        }
        /* Free the scratchpad. */
        free(curcontents);
@@ -1938,13 +1942,13 @@
         * preserved, but in that case we might perform unneeded erase which
         * takes time as well.
         */
-       msg_cdbg("Reading old flash chip contents... ");
+       msg_cinfo("Reading old flash chip contents... ");
        if (flash->read(flash, oldcontents, 0, size)) {
                ret = 1;
-               msg_cdbg("FAILED.\n");
+               msg_cinfo("FAILED.\n");
                goto out;
        }
-       msg_cdbg("done.\n");
+       msg_cinfo("done.\n");
 
        // This should be moved into each flash part's code to do it 
        // cleanly. This does the job.


-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/


_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to