Pete Heist <notificati...@github.com> writes:
>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 1:40 PM, flent-users <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pete,
>>
>> > On Aug 25, 2018, at 19:53, Pete Heist <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > 50ms wouldn't be too disruptive in most cases. At 1 Mbit, the 5% of
>> > bandwidth threshold is crossed.
>>
>> Would it be possible to simply also show this bandwidth use in the
>> bandwidth plots (say as a single data series accumulated over all
>> irtt probes), then the user could select the interval and still be
>> able to easily assess the effects on other bandwidth flows? I believe
>> that would also be great for the netperf UDP/ICMP streams, but
>> probably harder to implement
>
>
> We could, but I would think what might happen is that in most cases
> you’ll have a line that appears close to 0 Mbit, relative to other
> flows, and we probably wouldn’t want to change the scaling for the
> scaled bandwidth plots to accommodate that...
I think the important part of this is that it would be reflected in the
total bandwidth score. I've been meaning to implement this for a while
for netperf UDP_RR, because otherwise you can get spurious bandwidth
drops as latency decreases just because the latency measurement flows
take up more bandwidth. But, well, irtt sort of made that less urgent ;)
But I could revisit; I do believe I already capture the data from irtt
(I think?).
-Toke
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416208064
_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org
