actually - and I can see pete running screaming from the room - we could add
tcp-like behavior to irtt and obsolete netperf entirely except for referencing
the main stack. The main reason we use netperf was because core linux devs
trusted it, and the reason why we sample only is because timestamping each
packet and extracting stats from it is hard in light of mss and the complexity
of the netperf codebase.
Implementing tcp-like behavior and tcp-like congestion controllers on top of
irtt seems simpler in comparison, and we already have better timestamp
facilities than tcp in irtt.
Who here likes playing the Zerg as much as I do?
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/148#issuecomment-416450498
_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org
