Well, looks a bug on flex compiler, since it should detect that and switch to static linked automatically... You can do that manually: http://sites.sonatype.org/flexmojos/flexmojos-maven-plugin/compile-swc-mojo.html#staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries
<http://sites.sonatype.org/flexmojos/flexmojos-maven-plugin/compile-swc-mojo.html#staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries>But is there any scenario where the current behavior is valid? If no, I can implement this logic on flexmjos to get static link automatically. VELO On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Carsten Schlipf <[email protected]>wrote: > > Hi all, > > during the change of a bigger project to RSLs I noticed that libraries > are way bigger than they should be. After looking further into this I > found out that a library is ALWAYS statically linked against > dependencies, no mater wheter the scope is RSL or Caching. > > You can find a more detailed explanation and a sample project at > > > http://www.yeap.de/blog2.0/archives/203-Size-of-Flex-RSLs-with-dependencies-to-other-RSLs.html > > Velo, are you already aware of this? As of my understanding I assume a > bug in the Flex compiler and not in flex-mojos, but I would like to > hear your opinion, before I file a JIRA report at Adobe. > > Best regards, > Carsten > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
