I simply created a RSL, that's what I meant by a dynamically linked library. And in case of applications it works . Just not in case of libraries. On my blog you can see how I have created the libraries and what the results are. There you'll also find a sample project with the mentioned libraries and the application for download.
On Jun 22, 2:23 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Ow, I see now, and how did you manage to build a dynamic linked library? > VELO > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Carsten Schlipf > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi Velo, > > > Just to make sure you understood me correctly: Actually I want my > > libraries to be dynamically linked, not statically. But the compiler > > still linkes the libraries statically. > > > According to the documentation the option > > staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries is set to false by default, so this > > is the case in my sample project. So in case this option is false, my > > libraries should be dynamically linked against RSLs and not > > statically. But that's not the case. It looks like > > staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries is always set to true. I just set it > > to false explicitly, but still no change. RSLs are still compiled > > statically into libraries (just into libraries, not into > > applications). > > > Best regards, > > Carsten > > > On Jun 22, 1:36 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, looks a bug on flex compiler, since it should detect that and > > switch > > > to static linked automatically... > > > You can do that manually: > >http://sites.sonatype.org/flexmojos/flexmojos-maven-plugin/compile-sw... > > > > <http://sites.sonatype.org/flexmojos/flexmojos-maven-plugin/compile-sw.. > > .>But > > > is there any scenario where the current behavior is valid? > > > > If no, I can implement this logic on flexmjos to get static link > > > automatically. > > > > VELO > > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Carsten Schlipf > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > during the change of a bigger project to RSLs I noticed that libraries > > > > are way bigger than they should be. After looking further into this I > > > > found out that a library is ALWAYS statically linked against > > > > dependencies, no mater wheter the scope is RSL or Caching. > > > > > You can find a more detailed explanation and a sample project at > > > > >http://www.yeap.de/blog2.0/archives/203-Size-of-Flex-RSLs-with-depend. > > .. > > > > > Velo, are you already aware of this? As of my understanding I assume a > > > > bug in the Flex compiler and not in flex-mojos, but I would like to > > > > hear your opinion, before I file a JIRA report at Adobe. > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Carsten --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
