Ok, I should be more precise here:

> > > The problem is that the resulting "release" swf file is much too small
> > > in comparison to both the Flashbuilder version and also the related
> > > output of compile-swf.

So, the problem is that also the same output swf of compile-swf and
the release output of test-swf differ as follows:
size of the first is 2,42MB whereas size of the second is 242kB in
comparison to 3207kB of the test swf.
(of course as a result of adding the testing artifacts, the sizes of
two outputs test/release differ - this is not the question).

On Jul 27, 2:04 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> ?!
>
> What did you expected?
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, matthias-s-t <
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, ok my fault, the dependency must of course be
>
> > <dependency>
> >        <groupId>com.icw.cdm.platform</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>cdm-flex-ria-delegates</artifactId>
> >        <version>SNAPSHOT</version>
> >        <scope>test</scope>
> >         <type>swc</type>
> > </dependency>
>
> > After this is fixed, the related include-libraries entry is added
> > correctly.
>
> > Yet this seems only to be part of the story. The file sizes of release
> > and test output still differ (242kB vs 3207kB).
>
> > Any explanation?
>
> > If the problem lies in the type of the dependency, why should this
> > only apply to the release version and not to the test swf?
> > Does flexmojos handle jar dependencies in the test?
>
> > On Jul 27, 12:58 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Flexmojjos does no handle jar dependencies.
>
> > > Sent from DROID
>
> > > Em 27/07/2010 06:15, "matthias-s-t" <[email protected]
>
> > > >escreveu:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I am trying to automate our tests with RiaTest and built some
> > > delegates for this purpose. They basically work fine when building
> > > with Flexbuilder/eclipse, yet I do not manage to build them with flex-
> > > mojos.
>
> > > The delegates (and the automation libs) should be integrated into our
> > > application swf for QA purposes, yet not into the release. For this
> > > purpose I am using the test-swf goal (with flex-mojos 3.6.1).
>
> > > The problem is that the resulting "release" swf file is much too small
> > > in comparison to both the Flashbuilder version and also the related
> > > output of compile-swf.
>
> > > Here is part of my pom.xml:
>
> > > ...
> > > <executions>
> > >        <execution>
> > >                <id>compile-cdmclient-flex-sources</id>
> > >                <phase>compile</phase>
> > >                <goals>
> > >                        <goal>test-swf</goal>
> > >                </goals>
> > >                <configuration>
> > >                        <sourceFile>CDM.mxml</sourceFile>
> > >                        <sourcePaths>
> > >                                <path>src/main/flex</path>
> > >                                <path>src/main/resources</path>
> > >                                <path>src/main/generator</path>
> > >                                <path>src/main/locales/{locale}</path>
> > >                        </sourcePaths>
> > >                        <targetPlayer>10.0.0</targetPlayer>
> > >                        <compiledLocales>
> > >                                <locale>en_US</locale>
> > >                                <locale>de_DE</locale>
> > >                        </compiledLocales>
> > >                        <themes>
>
> > >  <theme>${project.build.outputDirectory}/themes/halo.swc</theme>
> > >                        </themes>
> > >                </configuration>
> > >        </execution>
> > > </executions>
> > > ...
>
> > > The dependency for automation is included as follows:
>
> > > <dependency>
> > >        <groupId>com.test.package</groupId>
> > >        <artifactId>cdm-flex-ria-delegates</artifactId>
> > >        <version>SNAPSHOT</version>
> > >        <scope>test</scope>
> > > </dependency>
>
> > > This is the only difference in the pom between release and test.
>
> > > A workaround is to include two executions one for test-swf and the
> > > other for compile-swf. Yet my understanding was that this would not be
> > > necessary since test-swf takes care of both outputs.
>
> > > Any idea what the problem could be?
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.To post to this group, send 
> > > email>[email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send 
> > > email>[email protected]<toflex-mojos%[email protected]>>
> > >  
> > > <flex-mojos%[email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.> To post to this group, send email 
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email 
> > to>[email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to