> Adding the type declaration to my parent pom fixed it. I'd like to > understand why it wasn't a problem not to have that when building with > 3.2...but I won't look that horse in the mouth. > Not true, you either fake the artifact some or did it correctly.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
