Well, have 2 goal with similar logic means one will evolve and the other
will be forgotten =/

Also, CopyMojo also has logic to deal with modules, runtime localization and
rsls....  this DependencyProcessorMojo only covers RSLs....

VELO

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote:

> If you prefer I can patch that goal, but I think a different goal better
> fit our needs. The CopyMojo works perfectly for war files and I love it,
> patching it can lead to a lot os switches in the code bacause of different
> default output directories, different artifact ype, etc... And I didn't want
> to break anything in the existing code so no complains will raise on the new
> version as many people is still using that version.
>
> I just wished to be on the safe side and I thought adding a different mojo
> could be the safest solution... But I see your point and I can refactor the
> CopyMojo if you wish.... still I think it's not the safest solution.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:51, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't see the point on creating a second goal that does almost the same
>> thing....  it would make more sense patch the goal that already exists
>> then....
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, it partially overlap but the CopyMojo works on war artifacts only
>>> while we wish to copy dependent artifacts into SWF project as well for
>>> testing purposes: our flex project is modular and we want to test it out of
>>> the scope of a war file...
>>>
>>> The alternative was to process the dependencies, including transitive
>>> ones, and copy all the artifacts using the dependency plugin, but as we use
>>> non-standard scopes (rsl, caching) which change the artifact type `on the
>>> fly` it was not applicable.
>>>
>>> Do you see my point or should I further explain?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 23:37, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is this DependencyProcessorMojo for? Doesn't it overlay CopyMojo?
>>>>
>>>> VELO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Pull request made, but I think I've to process the additional `cache`
>>>>> scope into the DependencyProcessorMojo... but I'm not sure...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:44, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pushing to my fork right now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, make pull requests to my fork and I will take a look ASAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VELO
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>
>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>
>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>
>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>
>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to