The two poms involved are flexmojos-testing/flexmojos-fbtest-harness
and flexmojos-testing/flexmojos-test-harness: they both refer to a
3.8-SNAPSHOT parent which actually is 3.9-SNAPSHOT.

This lead to a non working parent pom resolution.

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:02, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote:

> I've seen you have pulled my changes: are you going to release the changes
> soon or do you prefer to wait a little bit? I think I've found a couple of
> errors in the poms too, as they reference the old 3.8-SNAPSHOT instead of
> the 3.9-SNAPSHOT... If you search for the `3.8-SNAPSHOT` string you can find
> them, but if you prefer I can submit another change.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 22:22, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I've pushed the changes to my fork, waiting for your comments.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 13:31, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I'll give a look on how much it need to be changed to fix our
>>> needs.... I'll be back to you soon on this
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:29, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, have 2 goal with similar logic means one will evolve and the other
>>>> will be forgotten =/
>>>>
>>>> Also, CopyMojo also has logic to deal with modules, runtime localization
>>>> and rsls....  this DependencyProcessorMojo only covers RSLs....
>>>>
>>>> VELO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you prefer I can patch that goal, but I think a different goal
>>>>> better fit our needs. The CopyMojo works perfectly for war files and I 
>>>>> love
>>>>> it, patching it can lead to a lot os switches in the code bacause of
>>>>> different default output directories, different artifact ype, etc... And I
>>>>> didn't want to break anything in the existing code so no complains will
>>>>> raise on the new version as many people is still using that version.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just wished to be on the safe side and I thought adding a different
>>>>> mojo could be the safest solution... But I see your point and I can 
>>>>> refactor
>>>>> the CopyMojo if you wish.... still I think it's not the safest solution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:51, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see the point on creating a second goal that does almost the
>>>>>> same thing....  it would make more sense patch the goal that already 
>>>>>> exists
>>>>>> then....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it partially overlap but the CopyMojo works on war artifacts
>>>>>>> only while we wish to copy dependent artifacts into SWF project as well 
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> testing purposes: our flex project is modular and we want to test it 
>>>>>>> out of
>>>>>>> the scope of a war file...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The alternative was to process the dependencies, including transitive
>>>>>>> ones, and copy all the artifacts using the dependency plugin, but as we 
>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>> non-standard scopes (rsl, caching) which change the artifact type `on 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> fly` it was not applicable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you see my point or should I further explain?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 23:37, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is this DependencyProcessorMojo for? Doesn't it overlay
>>>>>>>> CopyMojo?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> VELO
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pull request made, but I think I've to process the additional
>>>>>>>>> `cache` scope into the DependencyProcessorMojo... but I'm not sure...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:44, Marvin Froeder 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Pushing to my fork right now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, make pull requests to my fork and I will take a look ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> VELO
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>>
>>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>>>
>>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to