Then you have to patch optimization goals =D On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Jahiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback guys. > > When building applications, I totally agree - one artifact per source > tree, but Flash is a magical technology, and a SWF can contain years > of development and best-practice architecture, or a SWF may only be a > simple asset bucket with a few animations and couple lines of > ActionScript. > > For me, I have both - an application with a highly structured > architecture following best practice - but this application needs to > load in >50 smaller SWFs (not all at once, it depends on user > interactions). These smaller SWF's are just asset buckets and might > have a few lines of code in them too - they are not applications, > merely a convenient asset management and scripting tool, so I was > hoping I could set aside 'best practice' for this use of SWF files, > and have a convenient way to batch compile them all, rather than > creating 1 POM per asset bucket. > > > > On Jan 27, 10:06 pm, Dascalita Dragos <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think Adobe embraces that in their projects. Only Flash Builder > > allows you to do that, but taken from the architectural point of view, > it's > > exactly how you have said: really bad practice. Will work for release 0.1 > > maybe, but until you reach 1.0 you'll have so many problems managing the > > swfs. > > > > I think it;s actually good that flex mojos doesn't allow that. > > > > Dragos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Producing more then one artifact (SWF) per source tree is a bad > > > practice..... unfortunately adobe seems to embrace and promote > that.... =/ > > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Jahiro <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> I guess I could setup individual POMs, but I have a project that needs > > >> to build more than 50 SWF files, with new SWF files added each week > > >> and was hoping to use the Module feature to manage this large number > > >> of SWFs gracefully, rather than having a large number of POMs to to > > >> maintain. > > > > >> In FlashBuilder it's easy to keep adding applications or modules in > > >> the project settings. The FlexMojo modules feature is a nice > > >> equivalent to this (unless there are other ways to add additional SWF > > >> applications to the POM?) > > > > >> On Jan 26, 6:36 pm, Dascalita Dragos <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Taking the modules out of the main project into separate projects > won't > > >> > work? > > > > >> > Dragos Dascalita Haut > > > > >> > On Jan 26, 2011 7:55 AM, "Jahiro" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > Thanks for getting back to me. > > > > >> > > I'm not sure how much work effort would be involved in adding this > > >> > > feature, as I don't have any experience writing Maven plugins or > even > > >> > > much Java. Do you think this would be a non-trivial feature to > > >> > > implement, or would it take significant time? > > > > >> > > Flash Builder has it's 'Release Build' feature that optimizes all > SWF > > >> > > files, including modules - would be great to see FlexMojo able to > > >> > > compile modules that are as small as the Flash Builder Release > Builds. > > > > >> > > On Jan 26, 12:38 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > Hrmm, I think I never thought on that =D > > > > >> > > > Would be a nice feature to someone implement ;) > > > > >> > > > VELO > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Jahiro < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > Hi There, > > > > >> > > > > The Apparat optimize-swf goal is great and working fine for > me, > > >> but > > >> > > > > was wondering if it's possible to run this goal on Modules as > well > > >> as > > >> > > > > the main application SWF? > > > > >> > > > > (Note, I don't mean the standard 'optimize=true' flag - I mean > the > > >> the > > >> > > > > Apparat extreme optimization: > > >> > > > > > https://docs.sonatype.org/display/FLEXMOJOS/Extreme+Optimization) > > > > >> > > > > For instance I have a main app specified like this: > > > > >> > > > > <sourceFile>MainApp.mxml</sourceFile> > > > > >> > > > > and 1 module specified like this: > > >> > > > > <modules> > > >> > > > > <module> > > >> > > > > <sourceFile>modules/Module1.mxml</sourceFile> > > >> > > > > <finalName>Module1</finalName> > > >> > > > > <destinationPath>modules</destinationPath> > > >> > > > > <optimize>true</optimize> > > >> > > > > </module> > > >> > > > > </modules> > > > > >> > > > > and I run this goal: > > >> > > > > <goal>optimize-swf</goal> > > > > >> > > > > But only MainApp.swf gets the Apparat optimization. Is it > possible > > >> for > > >> > > > > Apparat optimization to be run on Module1.swf as well? > > > > >> > > > > I'm using FlexMojo 4.0-Beta-5 > > > > >> > > > > Thanks for any help - if this isn't a feature yet or if it's a > > >> bug, > > >> > > > > I'm happy to add a Jira ticket - just wanted to check first to > see > > >> if > > >> > > > > I've missed anything. > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > -Jahiro > > > > >> > > > > -- > > >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > >> > > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected] > > >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> > > > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > <flex-mojos%2Bunsubscribe@googlegrou ps.com> > > >> <flex-mojos%2Bunsubscribe@googlegrou ps.com> > > > > >> > <flex-mojos%2Bunsubscribe@googlegrou ps.com> > > > > >> > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > > >> > > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > >> > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > <flex-mojos%2Bunsubscribe@googlegrou ps.com> > > >> <flex-mojos%2Bunsubscribe@googlegrou ps.com> > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > > >> > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > > >> -- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > <flex-mojos%2Bunsubscribe@googlegrou ps.com> > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > > >>http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > <flex-mojos%2Bunsubscribe@googlegrou ps.com> > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
